Which brings us to Grassley, who is the actual story here and who nobody will remember by Friday. He didn’t gavel Booker down because Booker is a Democrat. He gaveled him down because the man’s time had expired and a committee where time limits are optional is not a committee. That’s the unglamorous function the whole apparatus depends on: someone at the front of the room who enforces the rules the same way regardless of which side is running long.

Grassley has been doing that job, and grinding out records requests that nobody else bothers with, since before most of the people in that room were in law school. He is also the senator currently prying loose FBI documents on Butler that the Bureau had no intention of volunteering. The contrast is the column. One man treats a hearing as a stage; another treats it as a procedure that produces information.

The temptation for the right is to file this under “Democrat humiliated, good day.” Take the better lesson instead. The reason Booker’s performance reads as hollow isn’t that he was loud. It’s that nothing in those four and a half minutes could ever have produced a fact. And the reason Patel’s comeback isn’t the triumph it’s being sold as is that it couldn’t have either. A Republican senator on that dais with a document in his hand and a specific question about it would have done more damage to a hostile narrative than every viral moment of that hearing combined.

Grassley has spent five decades proving that. He asked the right question on Tuesday, and it wasn’t the one that went viral. It was whatever he planned to ask next, once the theater kid finally sat down.