Newly declassified FBI interview notes are stirring up a storm, raising serious allegations against Senator Adam Schiff. According to the memos, a whistleblower claims that while Schiff led the House Intelligence Committee, he allegedly approved leaks of classified documents aimed at undermining Donald Trump\u2019s presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The documents, obtained by Just the News, detail interviews with a former Democratic intelligence staffer who served on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) between 2017 and 2023. The staffer, whose identity remains confidential, told FBI agents that Schiff authorized leaks of sensitive intelligence to support the \u201cRussiagate\u201d narrative and potentially build a case against Trump. The memos also point to Rep. Eric Swalwell as a possible conduit for some of the leaks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In one striking passage, the whistleblower described being called to an all-staff meeting where Schiff allegedly instructed that certain classified information be leaked. The staffer reportedly objected, calling the plan \u201cillegal and unethical,\u201d but was reassured it would go unnoticed. The whistleblower also claims that raising concerns led to their termination\u2014though DOJ memos show no response to that allegation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Adding to the intrigue, the documents allege Schiff was promised the CIA Director role under a potential Hillary Clinton presidency\u2014a position that never materialized after Trump\u2019s victory. According to the staffer, Schiff allegedly continued pushing for leaks even after the 2016 election.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Continue reading on next page…<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Schiff, now a senator, has forcefully denied the claims, calling them \u201cbaseless smears\u201d from former staffers and pointing to prior DOJ reviews that found the allegations lacked credibility. Meanwhile, House Republicans, led by figures like Rep. Jim Jordan, are signaling they may summon Schiff and former Attorney General Merrick Garland to testify, seeking clarity on whether intelligence was weaponized for political gain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Legal experts point to the Speech or Debate Clause, which grants congressional members immunity for legislative acts, as a key hurdle. Supporters argue any discussion of leaks could be protected; critics counter that leaking classified material may fall outside that shield. Past DOJ reviews reportedly declined prosecution due to these legal uncertainties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It\u2019s important to note that the declassified memos contain allegations, not proof. While they raise serious questions about potential political influence over intelligence operations, they do not confirm any criminal wrongdoing. What they do highlight is the ongoing debate over transparency, oversight, and the delicate balance between Congress and national security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As this story unfolds, testimony, hearings, or additional investigations could determine whether the claims hold weight\u2014or fade into political controversy. For now, the public is left parsing conflicting accounts, anonymous sources, and official documents that continue to spark debate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\ud83d\udcac What do you think? Should Congress investigate these allegations further, or are they part of political theater? Share your thoughts below!<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Newly declassified FBI interview notes are stirring up a storm, raising serious allegations against Senator Adam Schiff. According to the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":2303,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2302"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2304,"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2302\/revisions\/2304"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2303"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tbdig.com\/sirbenet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}