A single message from former President Donald Trump has set Washington ablaze, reigniting one of the most extreme and rarely used powers in the U.S. Constitution: the 25th Amendment. What started as a provocative note to Norway’s prime minister has exploded into a full-blown debate over presidential fitness, executive authority, and how far political tolerance can stretch in today’s hyper-polarized climate.
The controversy centers on a message Trump reportedly sent to Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, in which he vented about missing out on the Nobel Peace Prize and linked that grievance to aggressive statements about U.S. global dominance. He also raised the idea of asserting “complete and total control” over Greenland for national security—hinting, without ruling it out, at potential military action. The remarks immediately alarmed lawmakers, diplomats, and allies across the Atlantic.
Democrats quickly labeled the communication a dangerous flashpoint. Some called for invoking Section 4 of the 25th Amendment, a constitutional tool designed to remove a sitting president deemed unable to perform the duties of office. Ratified in 1967 after JFK’s assassination, the amendment allows the vice president and a majority of Cabinet members to declare the president incapacitated. Congress then decides whether that decision stands—but it requires a two-thirds vote in both chambers, a nearly impossible threshold in today’s divided environment.
Even so, the mere discussion highlights growing concern over Trump’s judgment and stability. Some Democrats have called him “mentally unfit,” citing his fixation on personal slights and willingness to threaten allies. A handful of Republicans, including prominent figures like Rep. Don Bacon and Senator Mitch McConnell, have also expressed unease, though none have openly pursued constitutional action.
Continue reading on next page…