What the Video Allegedly Shows
In the recording, the undercover journalist tells the nonprofit director that he is an immigrant who has not registered to vote and was directed to seek information on how to participate in the election. The director asks follow-up questions and, according to OMG, provides directions to a polling location.
At one point, the director allegedly suggests which candidate to support by referencing a name beginning with the letter “M.” OMG claims this could raise concerns because tax-exempt organizations classified as 501(c)(3) entities are prohibited from engaging in political campaigning.
James O’Keefe, founder of OMG, shared the video on social media, stating that the exchange could represent a potential violation of election and nonprofit regulations. These claims have not been independently verified.
Legal Context
Voting in New York City elections is restricted to eligible, registered voters, and non-citizens are not permitted to vote in mayoral races. Election law experts note that providing guidance to vote illegally or directing political preferences could raise serious legal questions if substantiated.
When later approached by OMG, the nonprofit director reportedly denied instructing anyone to vote illegally or endorsing a specific candidate.
Broader Political Backdrop
The video surfaced amid heightened political attention surrounding New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who recently took office. Mamdani has drawn criticism following a fare increase implemented by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), which raised the base subway and bus fare from $2.90 to $3.
Although the fare increase was approved by the MTA board last year—prior to Mamdani taking office—some residents criticized the timing, citing his campaign pledge to work toward free bus service. Transit officials have emphasized that fare decisions are made independently by the MTA and are driven by budgetary and operational considerations.
Ongoing Questions
At this time, no official findings or legal actions related to the nonprofit video have been announced. The footage has sparked debate online about election integrity, nonprofit compliance rules, and the responsibilities of organizations that serve immigrant communities.
As with any undercover recording, the full context and accuracy of the claims remain subject to further review.